Skip to the content
All 31 lessons
Liberatory learning Sense-making 40 minutes

Finding shape in a complicated situation

Learning intention By the end of this lesson, students can map the parts, perspectives and open questions in a complex situation without forcing one quick explanation.

Time
40 minutes
How the room works
Groups of three or four
You need
Large paper, pens and optional sticky notes
Opens with
First attempts

Before you start

Keep topics general and avoid asking groups to map a real conflict, disclosure or traumatic event. Do not treat abuse, discrimination or verified harm as a matter of equally valid perspectives.

Read the full safeguarding note Adapting it for your class A note home for this lesson
A person deep in thought, question marks and a lightbulb around their head
Illustration by RecipesforWellbeing.org, CC BY-NC 4.0

Open this drawing in the library

Scan for this lesson online

Why this matters

Some experiences arrive without a clear story: an unexpected result, a disagreement or information that does not fit. Sense-making helps us hold several parts together, recognise what we do not know and build a provisional understanding. It does not require every mess to become meaningful or every question to be resolved.

Skill in context Deepening understanding of something difficult or complicated and constructing meaning from what feels chaotic.

On the skill of sense-makingTry the interactive practice
1

Open with “First attempts”

5 min

Use First attempts as a private look at information gained through trying. Students do not need to revisit a painful or high-stakes event.

Read aloud

Think of one low-stakes attempt from this year that did not go as you hoped, whether it was a task, a game or a plan that changed.

Ask quietly what you know now because you made that attempt and what you might choose differently another time.

An unsuccessful attempt can provide information while disappointment and real consequences remain.

You do not need to share the memory or turn it into a positive story.

Listen for Make the low-stakes and private boundaries clear. Do not look for relief or treat the reflection as successful because a student appears calmer.

2

Teacher explanation

10 min

Sense-making is what we do when events, information and viewpoints need to be arranged into a picture we can work with. Our first explanation may be shaped by expectation, limited information or the need to escape uncertainty quickly.

A stronger account remains open to correction. It names what happened, who sees it differently, which relationships matter and what is still unknown. Sometimes the result is greater clarity; sometimes it is a more accurate understanding of why the situation remains complicated.

Questions for the room

  • What is the difference between a quick take and a developed understanding?
  • Why can uncertainty feel difficult to leave open?
  • How do other perspectives improve sense-making, and when should an account not be treated as merely one side among many?
3

The mess map

18 min
  1. Offer broad questions such as why misinformation spreads, why scrolling is hard to stop or why a rule can affect groups differently. Students may pass on a topic.
  2. Place one question in the centre of a large page and agree not to race towards a verdict.
  3. Build four branches: the parts involved, the positions people hold, the open questions and the connections between them.
  4. Mark evidence separately from assumptions and write "not sure" wherever the group does not know.
  5. Visit two other maps and add one missing position, piece of evidence or question, without trying to correct the whole map.
  6. Share one connection that became clearer and one part that became more complex.
4

Private reflection

5 min

When something stops making sense, which move may help you next: asking another question, drawing the parts, checking evidence or listening to a position you missed?

How they reflect Private journal

5

Closing

2 min

Not everything needs to be solved before it can be understood more carefully. Sense-making lets us build the clearest picture available and leave space for what has not yet found a place.

Safeguarding

Keep topics general and avoid asking groups to map a real conflict, disclosure or traumatic event. Do not treat abuse, discrimination or verified harm as a matter of equally valid perspectives. Pause and follow safeguarding procedures if personal material emerges.

If something a young person says gives you concern, follow your setting’s usual safeguarding route. This is not yours to carry alone.

Adapting it

Ages 13 to 15
Use concrete topics such as rumours, group chats and games, and model each branch before groups begin. Keep "not sure" visible as a useful response.
Ages 16 to 18
Use systemic questions and add a branch for power and assumptions. Ask what evidence would change the map.

In other settings

Form time
Use First attempts, then build a short map together with parts, positions and open questions.
Assembly
Model one general mess map on screen and show how "not sure" can remain part of an honest account.
Small group
Explore one complicated general question conversationally, keeping evidence, assumptions and unknowns distinct.

Curriculum connections

IB, ATL
Thinking: critical thinking skills (analysing complex concepts, using models to explore complex systems)Checked by AI review against the IB's MYP: From principles into practice, Approaches to learning (for use from September 2014/January 2015, a school-hosted copy) on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.
OECD Learning Compass
Skills: cognitive and meta-cognitive skills (critical thinking)Checked by AI review against the OECD Learning Compass 2030 concept notes Skills for 2030 and Core Foundations for 2030 (2019) on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.
UNESCO SEL
Critical Inquiry (mapping viewpoints instead of one explanation)Checked by AI review against MGIEP's page naming the four competencies, with their definitions from summaries of Rethinking Learning (MGIEP, 2020), which could not be opened on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.
WHO life skills
Critical thinking — analysing information and experiences; Problem solving — laying out the parts of a complex problemNot yet checked against its source.
Inner Development Goals
Thinking: Systems Thinking; Thinking: Perspective SkillsChecked by AI review against the Inner Development Guide's 25 skills across 5 dimensions (idg.guide, 2025) on 10 October 2026, not yet by a human adviser.

Suggest a correction

Find your country’s curriculum
Tell us how this lesson went

Your email opens with this lesson named in the subject, and nothing is sent until you send it. A person reads these.

Or write to info@recipesforwellbeing.org

    Arrow keys move between steps. F is full screen.